WIE: In your own life, you were a very successful artist, but
you gave up your career, gave up fame and fortune to devote yourself to the
spiritual life. What was it that compelled you to leave your own life behind
and take that step?
TB: Actually, both my wife and I were artists,
and we felt very strongly that it was feeding our egos. Art, art exhibitions,
and the consequences of being accepted and successful are incredible food
for your ego, which is the Sufi's enemy. The final straw was when we went
to Rome to visit a friend, a sculptor, and there was a very pretty young girl
there whom my friend introduced me to. And she was so adoring to me. She said,
"Ohhh, I know you. I
love your art." She was completely praising
me, and I saw the ego suddenly rise up and say, "Aha! This beautiful,
spiritual girl is telling you that you are a great artist." So I said,
"Oh, my God! That's it. It's over." I hit the ego on the head and
decided I was finished with it all.
WIE: In the Sufi tradition, what is the
ideal relationship to the world for those who have gone very deep into the spiritual
life?
TB: I'll just say that what I myself do and
what I ask my students to do is to find their place in the world, or I should
say their duty, their function in this world. And when they find it, they should
do it as best they can. And they should ask for Allah's help in finding it and
doing it. For example, when a person wants to go to college and study certain
things, they often take aptitude tests. So in a much larger and more complete
sense, we have to pass ourselves through aptitude tests and find out what we
have been brought into this world to do, and then we must do it as best we can.
I think that's how one's relationship should be to the world.
Thirty years ago, if somebody would have told me that I was going to
be a Sufi and a sheikh, I would have laughed and said, "What are they
talking about?" Therefore, you cannot say that I did it. Finally, Allah
has to do it for you. That is why when we pray, we open our hands. If your
hands are open and something drops into them, you can catch it. But if they're
not open, you can't. It falls away. So you have to be open, and that's all
that you can do. I don't even say open your heart. You have to open
yourself,
everything—your body, your mind, your potential. You have to keep everything
open and somehow hope to receive direction and indication as to what your function
is. And once you find your function, I think then you will also find yourself
through your function.
WIE: As you've said, Sufism isn't generally
known as a spiritual tradition that emphasizes renunciation of the world. But,
in the Sufi tradition, does renunciation play some role in the quest for spiritual
union? I've read many stories by Sufi mystics that detail the dangers of the
"deceiving" world with its "limitless tricks" and that encourage
the seeker to fly away from it on the "wings of prayer." That seems
to suggest that renunciation or removal from the world offers the surest and
safest path to the realization of spiritual freedom and communion with God.
TB: In our discipline, we don't agree with
this. On the contrary, I would go so far as to say that renunciation is a sin.
Renunciation means that I am thirsty and he, Allah, is offering me a glass of
water and I say, "No thank you." That's a sin! For instance, Allah
offers to reduce our prayers when we are traveling. And some idiots say, "No.
I will continue making my prayers as if I'm not traveling." That's an insult.
It's a sin. Because Allah offers you a gift and you say, "No, keep your
gift." It's arrogance in the extreme, this renunciation business. This
isn't just my opinion; this is the opinion of the Sufis. You should take whatever
it is you receive, and you should put it to good use. If you don't want it,
give it to somebody who needs it! I have, praise to Allah, enough money. But
if he gave me a million dollars today, I'm not going to refuse it. I'm
going to take it and I'm going to give it to the ones who need it and keep some
for myself too. I'll buy myself a new car instead of an old one, and maybe a
$150 pair of shoes. That would be the day!
So there is no going to the monasteries, no climbing up the Himalayas, no
pouring ashes on your head and sitting cross-legged on nails. You have to go
out into the world and participate. For example, my own teacher, Sheikh Muzaffer,
loved to eat, loved good food. And he had a young wife, whom he loved very much.
He used to say, "Money—there should be a lot in your pocket, but none in
your heart."
WIE: What about the example of Jesus?
He is considered to be a Sufi prophet and yet he encouraged people to leave
the world behind and follow him.
TB: In Arabic, we call Jesus "Ruhullah,"
the spirit of God—or more accurately "Ruhu min Allah," which means
not the spirit
of Allah, but the spirit
from Allah. Jesus was
pure spirit, you see, and a human being cannot be pure spirit. His method of
teaching was not by example. In fact, whoever tried to imitate him got eaten
by the lions, or lost in the dark chambers of monasteries or convents which
were not good for anybody. His message was not through imitation, but through
what he said. So I don't agree with you that the teaching of Christ was to abandon
the world. It is just that some people tried to follow his example, which
is absolutely impossible to follow. But his
teaching is possible to follow.
WIE: Today there is a growing spiritual
movement in America that has been very critical of traditional spiritual paths
and teachings, specifically those that emphasize a separation between the
world and a transcendent God. This new philosophy claims that even the most
mundane aspects of our worldly lives are inherently sacred and can potentially
become the vehicles for spiritual awakening. Books on such subjects as sacred
sexuality, sacred sports, and spirituality in the workplace are becoming more
and more popular, blurring the lines between what is considered to be spiritual
and what is considered to be secular. In her recent book The New American
Spirituality,
Elizabeth Lesser writes, "The bliss of the world is no
less spiritual than the bliss of transcendence," and goes on, "We
can indeed 'follow our bliss' as we follow the spiritual path, whether that
bliss is . . . reading a holy text or running a marathon." So my question
is: Are the proponents of this new spirituality on the right track? In the end,
what exactly is the difference between a holy life and a worldly life? Is
there any difference at all?
TB: What they say is, in a sense, true. If,
in running the marathon, you feel that the force in you which permits you to
run is from God, the ground which you are running upon is from God, and
the breath which you inhale and exhale is from God, then this experience is
indeed more important than reading the Bible in vain. But they're not teaching
this, you see. What they say is taken from the scriptures; it's true. But their
intention, by saying that a marathon is equal to the Qu'ran, is to abolish the
Qu'ran. Their premise is right, but their actions and their intentions are wrong.
You see, there is nothing new in the world. But they think that because
we're living in the twenty-first century, things have changed. Nothing has changed.
The same thing is valid now as was valid for the caveman, except, of course,
that life was simpler. Life became more complicated, but we still have the same
sized brain. And we have the same good and bad, right and wrong, sweet and bitter,
dark and light—everything has existed for a long time. The camel became
the airplane, but everything is the same. At the time of Jesus, all these
problems that we have today existed. Read the Bible. The villains were there.
The thieves were there. The murderers were there. The politicians were there.
Everybody was there, doing the same thing! So what makes people think that new
solutions have to be found? What makes them think that they know better than
Jesus? They're arrogant, and that's the problem.
WIE: Would you say that in the Islamic
teachings, our daily lives in the world are sanctified through our ongoing voluntary
submission and surrender to the will of God?
TB: It's not as simple as that. Submission,
yes, but
cognizant submission. Not blind submission. That's the difference
between the orthodox and the mystic. The orthodox
blindly submits, and
in blindly submitting, imagination may intervene. While the Sufi, the mystic,
tries to
understand and submit, and therefore taste what he is eating.
The orthodox eats at McDonalds and then goes to a French restaurant and eats
beef bourguignon. To him, it's the same thing. He doesn't taste it, he just
submits, he eats. But the Sufi chooses. The hamburger tastes bad and he recognizes
that, so he goes and eats the beef bourguignon. He tastes his religion and
he understands what he's doing. He submits willingly and knows that one thing
doesn't taste good and the other does. That's the difference.
WIE: In the "new American spirituality,"
instead of that kind of cognizant submission to a higher authority, many people
are speaking about self
-authority—where it is up to us
to pick
and choose as we see fit from among the world's wisdom traditions, to find our
own methods and spiritual practices that suit our lives in the world.
TB: There you go
kaputski. There
you go crazy. There you go arrogant. You're saying: I know better than God.
I know better than Jesus. I know better than Moses. I know better than the sheikhs.
You see, we are forbidden to say "my." We are forbidden to say "me."
This is
my idea. This is
my concept. This is
my right.
This is
my wrong. Forget it, it's just anti-discipline. This is self-glorification,
making your own self your God. And that's deadly. And those people, they die.
They're living zombies. They live this life with imagination, with no concept
of truth, no concept of reality. They live in their imagination, and they die
in their imagination and they will wake up when they die and say, "Oh,
my God, what have I done to myself?"
For 6,000 years in Judaism, for 2,000 years in Christianity, for 1,500 years
in Islam, hundreds of thousands of saints and spiritual teachers have devoted
themselves to this, and they have found and refined the relationship of
the human being to the world, to life, to the hereafter. And here comes
this man or this woman who studies a little psychology, a little philosophy,
and rejects the whole thing. Millions of people, intelligent people, devout
people, have made this their specialty. We are living in a period of specialty,
but those people were super-specialists. And their documents are here,
their words are here, their principles are here. It's not even worth discussing.
May Allah help these people. That's all that I can say. And may Allah forgive
them.
WIE: I have one last question. At what point
on the spiritual path are we ready to be of service to the world?
TB: At the beginning, in the middle, and at
the end. This is in the Qu'ran. Allah said that "I have created man so
that he can make
ibadat to me."
Ibadat means "service."
But it also means "worship." So the true worship is in service. Allah
said that "I have created man so that he serves me." But God
doesn't need service. On the contrary, he is
our servant. Every minute
of our lives, we are being served. I inhale; he makes me inhale. I exhale
;
he makes me exhale
. He brings me coffee; he makes me drink the
coffee. Twenty-four hours a day, to all of us—from the microbe to the highest
specimen of this creation—he's in continuous service. So what does he mean when
he says that he has created human beings so that they would serve him? In short,
he means to serve his creation. If we are the supreme creation, then we have
to serve those in creation who are like us, who are in need, or who are under
us. That's the purpose of our creation.
So as I said, service should be from the moment you are born until the
moment you give your last breath, but you have to find out in what way. That's
what's most important. We have to find out in what manner we are supposed
to serve.
WIE: Based on everything you've said, it
seems that in the Sufi view, the ultimate expression of our spiritual lives
is found in the world. I wanted to ask you about this because in some of the
great traditions, East and West, they say that what we are looking for is found
in the afterlife or in some future birth.
TB: No. Hell is here. Paradise is here. Everything
is here.